claypole
3:41 Mon Dec 30
Re: Losing Payet ended Bilic as losing Arnie ended Pellegrini
|
Not replacing them adequately probably played a bigger part in ending their reign
|
the exile
3:37 Mon Dec 30
Re: Losing Payet ended Bilic as losing Arnie ended Pellegrini
|
And why should Moyes have an issue with Antonio? He puts more of a shift in than most.
|
Huffers
3:35 Mon Dec 30
Re: Losing Payet ended Bilic as losing Arnie ended Pellegrini
|
He did pick them up again just before he left, just so he didn't leave them behind.
|
the exile
3:35 Mon Dec 30
Re: Losing Payet ended Bilic as losing Arnie ended Pellegrini
|
This is a very simplistic argument. There may be a bit of truth in it but there were many other factors.
|
Takashi Miike
3:21 Mon Dec 30
Re: Losing Payet ended Bilic as losing Arnie ended Pellegrini
|
arnie didn't want to play for us, he'd downed tools months before leaving
|
factory seconds
3:20 Mon Dec 30
Re: Losing Payet ended Bilic as losing Arnie ended Pellegrini
|
i think the point is colly, those games where arnie couldn't be bothered under moyes were generally the games we lost. hence the 29% win rate.
the fact our two of our three most emphatic wins were against mark hughes sides tells the tale of the tape.
for the record i was happy to see arnie gone given that he was a weapons grade tit.
|
camel-with-3-humps
3:17 Mon Dec 30
Re: Losing Payet ended Bilic as losing Arnie ended Pellegrini
|
It’s true losing Arnie is a huge blow. He could spin a man, play forward or alone, quick and strong. Sorely missed.
|
collyrob
3:14 Mon Dec 30
Re: Losing Payet ended Bilic as losing Arnie ended Pellegrini
|
Some people are massively overrating Arnautovic. The cunt disappeared for plenty of games. When he was on it and up for it he was very good. But those games were few and far between.
|
| 
